Martin's blog

 Well, this is a very complicated issue for me because I have never been very interested or motivated with the career. It seems to me that there are many things to change and that ends up demotivating me. The main thing is the length of the career, for me it is too long. In other countries where journalism is usually better, the career lasts a maximum of three years and here in Chile it lasts FIVE YEARS. There are many subjects that are shared with the film career that in my opinion do not contribute to my training as a professional. And it seems to me that they do this as an excuse to join both careers in a single faculty.  There are also things that I like. For example, the approach of the career that allows you to develop as a critical person in the face of social reasons. It also prepares you to be a journalist for written media and not for television. You can write essays or notes for newspapers.  In terms of infrastructure, I think it's enough. Obviously it could be...

I would prefer to go to the future. I think traveling to the future would be great because I can know what my life will be like at that time. I'm excited to know what I will work on or what my life will be like. Maybe I will have children - even though I don't want them now - or create a different family than the one I imagine. I would travel to when I'm 50, I think that's a perfect age to see how my life has gone and what my old age will be like.  I would not stay forever, I would like to live all the anecdotes that I lived to be like this at 50. Obviously, this is a very difficult question because there is always the regret of something you did. That's why I think the simple answer is that I would prefer to travel. But in my opinion, mistakes make you the person you are and it's not right to change them. In this blog I am obliged to answer the question where I would like to travel if to the future or to the past, but if I have the option to really decide what ...